Jurors in Twelve Angry Men

The film, 12 Angry men (1957), is a drama well-nigh(predicate) a jury that was to steady megabucks the fate of a young male child who was facing the electric automobile chair for supposedly violent death his father with a flick-knife knife. The twelve men were locked into a small, claustrophobic jury valet de chambrener on an unbearably piquant summer day until they came up with a unanimous finality - either fineable or not chargeable. Over the get over of the film the votes went from eleven blameful and one not, to a unanimous vote of not immoral. \nIn the film, there ar many different aspects of sight that finally lead to a right decision. Effective persuasions atomic number 18 when jurywoman eight foremost explains his reasons for voting not guilty at the beginning of the play. He effectively persuaded jurywoman ball club to vote not guilty by explaining that he had or so doubts that needed to be discussed. And then, he explains his doubt about the tribut e of the anile man about being able to es differentiate the boy yell Im divergence to kill you while the watch was tone ending past the window. He does this by discussing the amount of condemnation it takes for a train to get in the window and how loud it is. Also, he explains his doubt about the obsolete mans testimony about going to his front door and sightedness the boy running down the stairs. He does this by playing out how long it would truly take for the old man to get to his front door. Finally, jurywoman eight establishes that it is possible that the boy told the truth about the discombobulate knife, by purchasing and rescue in an exact facsimile of the knife in question. On the another(prenominal) side, there are some Ineffective persuasions. For example, juryman three tries to persuade the other jurors to stay with him by talk of the town about his own son. Juror ten tries to persuade the other jurors to vote guilty because of his racist views, etc. \nP athos, ethos, and logos spate be seen through the story. For example, juror eight uses ethos when he tries to explain to juror ten that the old man could not earn heard the boy say I�...